October 30, 2008

nice bod, wrong invite...hehehe


What about this online greeting card?


Happy Birthday of You
Happy Birthday of You






"be simply human....NEED ME? FRIEND WITH ME"





"I'm single yet confuse — Manila"



October 28, 2008

looks: excellent; grammar: careless

This is from one of my idols online. (picture was taken without permission)



"I sat down and interviewed famed male model Akihiro Sato on the set of his first movie, Handumanan today. He, along with actress/animal rights activist Chin-Chin Gutierrez, Jason Abalos and Carlo Maceda are in Dumaguete to shoot the film that is set here."

If one is naughty (like me), one is bound to imagine different scenarios after reading the first sentence. Did the author sat on the lap of Aki? Was he sitting down while Aki was standing up or strutting his stuff? I think Mark ( one of the most good-looking fellows in the blogworld) wanted to say he sat down with and interviewed etc.

The lack of comma after Handumanan leads me to assume that the title of the movie is Handumanan Today.

The error in the second statement is usually due to carelessness. Phrases such as together with, as well as, and along with are not the same as and. The phrase introduced by as well as or along with will modify the earlier word, but it does not compound the subjects (as the word and would do). So it should be: He, along with actress.....and Carlo Maceda, is in Dumaguete.


But then again, maybe our blogger Mark felt careless after talking to Aki and forgot his basic grammar? Hmmm.

October 27, 2008

a funny signage and two haikus

For the record, his services were much better than his grammar!



Two of my favorite bloggers posted haikus:

1. This is from justdrinkmilk:

Infatuated
yet totally one-sided.
Story of my life.


A haiku is best appreciated in its oral form when the measured rhythm becomes an auditory delight. The beauty of this haiku is in its composition, although it maintains the blogger's emotional landscape: desolate and depressing. The piece then goes against the tide since most haikus are celebrations of nature's beauty and bounty.

In its written form, the full stop in the second line is out of place. Maybe a colon will do the trick?




2. And from tristan:

The future looks bright

But, there is no guarantee.

Hoping for the best.


This one moves half a step away from desolation and faces the future with uncertainty. This is not as skillfully crafted as the first one, but the emotions are more fluid. The comma in the second line is unnecessary.

October 22, 2008

Walang Kawala premiered: strong film; weak sentence



from manilagayguy

"Walang Kawala is going to be premiered at the UP Film Institute on November 6. Tickets at 100 pesos available at the cinema booth on the day just before the showing time (7pm)."

1. The use of "is going to be premiered" is a confusing construction that can be avoided by the use of a future tense. "Walang Kawala will premiere at the UP Film Institute." Easier, right?

2. The second sentence can bemuse and bewilder even the most intelligent mind. Are tickets available on the day itself? Are tickets available the day just before showing time? If it's the former, then it will be wiser to a) simplify the sentence or b) you some punctuation:

a. Tickets at 100 pesos are available at the cinema booth just before showtime.

b. Tickets at 100 pesos are available at the cinema booth on the day itself, just before showtime.



"

October 21, 2008

Naked in Pagudpud, thinking about dona victorina

I don't have plans of posting anything in my blog this week. After all, I am in Pagudpud, Ilocos Norte at the Saud Beach Resort. I am here to rest and recreate myself. But I was reading Amiel's comment section where people responded to my comment about dog-eating.

So, despite the fact that I am terribly drunk, here is my response:

okay, since I brought it up...


No, there is no special resolution exempting Vigan from the animal welfare act. Exceptions are only allowed in areas defined as ancestral domains. The problem with environmental laws and animal rights is that they do not take priority in terms of law enforcement. I swear to god I saw several policemen lining up to eat in those dog- specialty eateries in Vigan, but nobody seems to care.

I come from an Igorot ancestry, so I should know that not all Cordillerans eat dogs. In the time of my forefathers, eating the dog of a fallen headhunter or warrior was part of the ritual to honor the dead. Most of the tribal warriors had dogs to accompany the hunt, and when the dog's master died, it was assumed that the spirit of the dog went with the master, so the dog was eaten as pure flesh.

My people were food gatherers, and yes, some tribes like the Ibaloi and Kankanaey have found eating dogs helpful during the very cold months because of the heat it gives to the hunters' body. Remember we wear g-strings? In the middle of a pine forest in the cold winds of December, the frost sometimes kill the weak?

It's not only the primitive faith of my people, it was also a survival mechanism that dog-eating became part of the culture.

Trust me on this, slowly my people are educating each other, and they have moved away from practices that dehumanize our culture, and damage the environment.

Tonight, I am naked here in Pagudpud, alone in the beach. I don't have a problem with that, nudity is the norm in my tribe. But certainly, we have learned to wear decent clothes when we the situation calls for it.

We have moved away from g-strings, we can move away from dog-eating. Give us some time.

October 17, 2008

Remembering Those Who Died of Wrong Grammar


1. Stella Strada

She was a boldstar who rose to fame in such movies as Kirot and Puri.

Her suicide note said:

THIS IS A CRAZY PLANETS

May she rest in pieces!

_____________________________


Incidentally, during the New Year's presentation of See True:

Inday Badiday: O sige ano na ang inyong prediction para kay Stella Strada.
Madam Auring: Lalo siyang sisikat sa darating na taon at malalampasan niya ang kasikatan ni Alma Moreno!

The next day's headline: STELLA STRADA COMMITS SUICIDE!

Prophecy fulfilled!
***

October 15, 2008

Cristy Fermin is really an error: the person and the grammar




Finally, the news that all humans have been waiting for. I welcome the news from pinoycelebritybuzz.com about Cristy's suspension. I just hate the wrong grammar.

Here's part of the blog:

"She is suspended as host from ABS-CBN’s “The Buzz” and as anchorperson from DZMM’s “Showbiz Mismo” until December 31, 2008.

ABS-CBN also said that Cristy Fermin violates the company’s high standard of professionalism and integrity in journalism which is detrimental not only to her name and credibility but also that of “The Buzz” and ABS-CBN."

1. You don't host FROM a particular show, you are host OF a show. So, Cristy Fermin is suspended as host of ABS-CBN's "The Buzz" and as anchorperson OF DZMM's etc etc.

2. That is a wicked, dangling dependent clause you got in there. What you are saying is that the integrity in journalism is detrimental to Cristy and the TV station. How so? Just divide the confusing statement into two:

ABS-CBN also said that Cristy Fermin violates the company’s high standard of professionalism and integrity in journalism. Such a violation is detrimental not only to her name and credibility but also that of “The Buzz” and ABS-CBN.

And while we are at it, I have two objections:

a. I object to the insinuation that Cristy Fermin had credibility prior to the violation.

b. I object to the term of the suspension. Why not extend her suspension until December 31, 2220.

October 14, 2008

Brian's Blog; Requiem for a Revenge

(Every Monday, I focus on the effects of blogs and blogging. Just for the heck of it)

Fifteen minutes is up for Brian Gorrel's blog.

Perhaps the loyal Team Brian still keeps the statistics going, but by the comment section alone , we know it has lost a significant percentage of its readership. Let us do some initial body count and assess the extent to which his blog has achieved its purpose. Although, Brian himself wrote that his reasons have evolved and have gone beyond the 70,000 target.

Some Uplinks:

a. Well, it seems he has moved on. That should be attributed to the blog. He found a lot of allies and supporters who helped rebuild his confidence. By this alone, the blog is a resounding success.
b. For a month, he made a case about the potential power of blogging as a platform to put across your message. Hundreds of college seniors owe much gratitude to Brian for giving them a thesis topic.
c. He created a circle of support and gained valuable friendships because of the blog. He is his own social networking site.
d. Filipinos were given a face of an HIV positive man and were granted entry into his colorful life. Before Brian, we knew of men and women who died from HIV complications, but mostly we heard about how they died. Now, we know how they live.
e. Some blogs became famous because of their link to Brian's blog. I wouldn't have heard about Dona Victorina and Misterhubs, if not for Brian.

Some downlinks:

a. The 70,000 has not been returned. DJ Montano did not give-in to the social pressure and until now remains free, perhaps planning for his return ala-Gabby Concepcion.
b. The very people whom Brian wanted to hurt by damaging their egos and their reputation bounced back with glee. They have become so famous that they increased their market value. Tim Yap and Celine Lopez used to define their sphere of influence within the elite and social climbing class. They should cut Brian some check, now that they are well-known all over the country.
c. We became aware of the downside of internet information - it creates news but it doesn't change lives. We cannot commit to the cause of someone we just read about. Too impersonal. Our best response was a few lines in the comment section. Then we move on to other blogs.

Brian Gorrel went the way of other whistle -blowers like Jun Lozada (remember him, the crying man?). We listened to them. We paid attention for a while. We echoed their sentiments. We created noise. We patted their backs, and sent them down the road.

Brian mirrors to us a face so familiar we hardly care anymore - the made-up face of a corrupt Philippines. Truth is, I am bored with Brian. He had become the male incarnation of Miriam Santiago - fun at first, feisty when fighting - until I realized he is saying the same thing again and again. He mouths slogans without deep analysis. He is like Sarah Palin - he knows how to attack without knowing the enemy or the logic of the war.

But that is because I expected his blog to be a political platform. It isn't. It's a personal blog. No more. No less.

You have to be Brian's friend to appreciate his blog. Because he does not have the humor of Misterhubs, the analysis of Dona Victorina, the elan of BryanBoy, the charisma of Docmcfitch, the expansiveness of ageage, or even the style of gibbscadiz.

He is simply Brian, who blogs.

October 12, 2008

Too much sucking is good!

It's Sunday. So I will focus on an entry which impressed me both for its construction and its style.

This is from justdrinkmilk:

"What do you do when it sucks to be you?

It sucks that I am unworthy to receive what is given to me. And even if I am worthy, it sucks that I may not be ready to receive what is given to me. It sucks that I am even whining over what could be somebody else’s dream. And for that, the more I feel unworthy. I do not deserve all these. It may seem that I am ungrateful but I am not. I am grateful and I appreciate it… truly.

It sucks that what I want may not be deserving of what I want to give. And even if he is worth it, it sucks that I am settling for something less than what I deserve. I am more than a third of that you can give. It sucks that at one point I considered it. It sucks that I suck at the game I tried to play; the game that I continue to play.

It sucks that I may never get the chance to walk this path again but I cannot seem to make my feet stop. It sucks that this may be the start of what I have been waiting for but I cannot seem to figure out what to do first. It sucks that I do not know what to do."

Literal sucking aside, this article illustrates four figures of speech seldom used by writers, and mostly never used by bloggers.

1. Anaphora - Repetition of the same word or phrase at the start of successive clauses or sentences. In the excerpt above, the phrase "it sucks" is repeated ten times, quite successfully. Whoever is It, It's mouth must be sore after doing all that sucking (lame joke, I know but I can't help it.) Watch the anaphoric triple shot: . It sucks that I suck at the game I tried to play; the game that I continue to play. Love it. I know a lot of bloggers who are good in sucking, but can they write stuff like this?

2. Metaphor - An implied comparison between two unlike things that actually have something important in common. Bloggers are fond of using metaphor (minitapor at minitapor niya po ako..), but most of them cannot manage to be consistent. Watch: "walk this path again but I cannot seem to make my feet stop" See the consistency - walk, path, feet!

3. Epexegesis - Adding words, phrases or sentences to further clarify or specify a statement already made. Here is his statement: It may seem that I am ungrateful but I am not. I am grateful and I appreciate it… truly.


4. Bdelygmia A litany of abuse--a series of critical epithets, descriptions, or attributes. In a sense, the whole sucking is litany is self-abusive, an attack on his own unworthiness.

Now all I need to do is to kiss this guy - no need for figures of speech.


October 11, 2008

Of irresponsible sex and grammar

I love this exchange between a blogger and his reader about House Bill 5043.

Bryan Miseducated's logic is flawless, but his sentence construction needs a bit of a makeover - maybe a few misplaced pronouns and missing punctuations.

Here's part of the post (the numbers and the red highlights are mine):

"While it’s unlikely that a horny daughter would bother mom about (1) her daytime itch let’s just say for the sake of argumentation that (2)my bitch of a daughter (3) comes to me and ask for a pill, I would hurriedly grab my D&G tote and the car key to visit the closest clinic and afterwards drive straight to a ravine… stupid momma, slut daughter, pill, dysfunction and all.

Come on, the case mentioned by Mr. Raymond has nothing to do (4) with lawmaking than it is an eventuality of failed parenting. You can’t say that Bill 5043 will turn daughters into whores. Hello…kitty! What our SECULAR government is (5) trying to do is address all options impartial to any moral paradigm.

P.S. (6) Last time I checked the Philippines is still a republic not a papal state."

1. It is as common as teenage pregnancy - the case of confusing pronouns. Whose daytime itch is referred to, the mother's or the daughter's?

2. Although it is understandable because the writing follows a style of free stream of thoughts, or commonly called as babbling, still the prose can still be improved by not shifting the point of view mid-sentence. It is better to divide it into two separate ideas:

It’s unlikely that a horny daughter would bother her mom about daytime itch. However, for the sake of argument, let's just say that if my bitch of a daughter comes to me and asks for a pill, I would hurriedly grab my D&G tote and the car key to visit the closest clinic, and afterwards drive straight to a ravine… stupid momma, slut daughter, pill, dysfunction, and all.

May I suggest that you leave the D&G behind?

3. Just like the Church, there is an inconsistency in the tenses of the verb: my daughter comes to me and ASKS...

4. The blogger was able to drive home the point that while Mr Raymund is a strong believer, he is a bad debater - his logic just went down the drain. But still, a good argument needs a good sentence construction.


"has nothing to do with lawmaking than WITH failed parenting.

Just a few minor things:


5. trying to do is TO address...

6. Last time I checked, the Philippines
is still a republic not a papal state.

Maybe it is.

October 10, 2008

Rustom Padilla's confusion is not about sexual orientation, it's about grammar


Based on his own revelations, Rustom Padilla was never confused about his sexual identity. Early in life, he knew he was gay. Showbiz handlers forced him to cover up his homosexuality and create an image of a straight guy. That's pretty clear.

An entry in manilagayguy's blog made the whole thing confusing.


"He knew of his sexual preference even when he was young, manifesting it by playfully wearing girl’s clothes which his father saw one time and which angered him of course. His mom, Eva CariƱo, berated him as well, it was said. "
The grammar is passable; the construction is as dull as Rustom's coming-out moment.
1. The careless use of pronouns led to a lack of clarity. Who was angry? Was it his father because he saw Rustom in girl's clothes? Was it Rustom because his father saw him wearing girl's clothes?
2. Then, there is the case of misplaced clauses. The best option is to cut the sentence into two to avoid confusion. "He knew his sexual preference even when he was young, manifesting it by playfully wearing girl's clothes. This made his father angry."
3. The last sentence is weird. Never splice a good sentence with three commas: "His mom, Eva CariƱo, berated him as well, it was said. " Simply say, "His mom Eva CariƱo berated him as well."

October 8, 2008

Brian Gorrel's TFC subscriber

This fan is very updated about showbiz gossip but out of touch with grammar.


"I am a
TFC subscriber and I am very well up-to-date regarding the latest showbiz brouhaha between Cristy Fermin, Nadia Montenegro, Rose Flaminiano and Gabby Concepcion. The issue that started the usual showbiz tirades became uglier and uglier each day to the point that the public viewers should be seriously concerned.
I am referring to Cristy Fermin’s heartless and God-unfearing attack on Nadia Montenegro."

a. Between is a preposition used to differentiate or relate two nouns:between Cristy and Nadia or between Rose and Gabby. If the brouhaha is about four people, then say INVOLVING Cristy, Nadia, Rose, and Gabby.

b. public viewers? as opposed to private viewers, I suppose. I think she means the viewing public.

c.
Okey, there are times when you have the license to invent new words, but definitely God-unfearing is way beyond acceptable.

October 7, 2008

Nadia's grammar is beyond forgiveness







"I have to remind Cristy Fermin, you are convicted for libel. You have no credibility no more. I do not know but I have to say this and I have to fight for what I believe in."


I will not even mention how dirty you look because of this mud-slinging. One of these days, Gretchen Barreto might experience an epiphany and will forgive you. Your grammar, girl, is beyond forgiving.


Sentence 1: I have to remind Cristy Fermin, you are convicted for libel. Dahling, you don't shift subjects in the middle of a sentence. Second, the conviction happened in the past, so it should be were, not are. Third, the correct proposition is convicted OF libel.


So, why not say, "I have to remind Cristy Fermin that she was convicted of libel.



Sentence 2: You have no credibility no more.

Let us assume that Cristy HAD credibility (which I seriously doubt), then avoid the double negative. "You don't have credibility anymore."


Sentence 3: I do not know but I have to say this and I have to fight for what I believe in."


Honestly, you've lost me. Girl, what the heck are you talking about?


Better get your act together, grammar or otherwise.

October 5, 2008

What Urban Legend? Vilma Santos Flying Maybe





I consider it an error of heroic (as in Darna!) proportions if Gov. Vilma Santos' life incidents are subjected to probe and labeled as URBAN LEGENDS!

An urban legend, if we want to be strict to its meaning (and we should be, since a universally accepted definition of a word or phrase is the basis for correct word usage), is an apocryphal, secondhand story told as true, plausible enough to be believed, and likely to be framed as a cautionary tale, about some horrific, embarrassing, ironic, or exasperating series of events that has supposedly happened to a real person.


This blogger chose some aspects of Gov. Vilma's history and treated them as if they were apocryphal or cautionary.

Come on!

Anyway, here's part of the post:

And now, PEP probes not only one, but three urban legends about Ate Vi:

1) During the late ‘60s, in an attempt to match her chief rival’s career, she also came out with music records. Critics of hers swear she used a ghost singer or singers for these albums.

(What is so
apocryphal or horrific about Ms. Vilma Santos using a ghost singer? Maybe Ate Vi actually used a real ghost as in mamaw.)

2) In her first Darna movie, Lipad Darna Lipad, since she was still in her teens, she refused to don the Darna costume without body stockings. So, the producers had to use a body double for some of the scenes.

(Hmmm, if I understand your article correctly, the producers used a body double. In showbiz lingo: ganun talaga iyan, gamitan!)

3) She had a nose-lift and other work done on her face.

(If THAT is a cautionary tale, then what do you call those works done on Regine V?)


October 4, 2008

Sentences as Sensible as KC





These statements are as sensible as their subject: the beautiful mega-daughter KC Concepcion, but the construction can still be improved:

from PEP.ph



"It seems that nowadays everything that KC Concepcion touches turns into gold. The Mega daughter has numerous endorsements, has starred in the hit movie For the First Time, and she has a top-selling album under her belt."

The two sentences above actually make sense, but the construction can still be improved.

a. The double use of "that" is unnecessary, and jarring for some readers, when dropping the second one will still make sensel. It goes: It seems that everything KC Concepcion touches turns into gold nowadays.

b. There is no consistency in the series found in the second sentence: has numerous endorsements, has starred in the ..., and SHE has a top. If the writer dropped the SHE, the sentence still makes its point.

October 3, 2008

Top notch Player, Good Looking Guy, Humble Man, Excellent Grammar, what's wrong with Chris Tiu



Check his blog, and look for errors in word usage, grammar, punctuation, and even lapses in sentence construction. If you can find one, tell me, at least I can spread the word that he is not perfect, as most fan assert that he is.

And as a rule, I don't go for tall Chinese men because they remind me of Yao Meng. But this guy is just so grounded, can't help but stand in line for his signature.

October 2, 2008

The Biggest Grammatical Error


Why????????

October 1, 2008

Richard Gutierrez looks good in pink, but talks non-sense

'I'm very comfortable wearing pink and I think every man should be comfortable (wearing pink). Only a real gentleman wears pink."

This is from Richard Gutierrez, he who is so shallow that all he can think of are women, cars, women and cars, thus he avoids dandruff.

Anyway, yes he looks good in pink, but he should stop talking, since he has a nasty habit of contradicting himself.

Advice One: "I think every man should be comfortable wearing pink." The context here of course is that pink is the color of gay men. He is asserting that every man ( as in ALL of them who have penises) should be comfortable wearing pink, whatever age, race, orientation or sleeping habits.

Advice Two: "Only a real gentleman wears pink."

Huh! Just goes to show that these guys don't think before they speak. Or maybe he doesn't understand the word "every".